Skip to content

⑤ Priority Sites for Survey

The fifth tab turns a habitat-suitability raster into a field-ready list of candidate survey sites. There are two distinct purposes — discovering new populations versus validating the model — and QMaxent supports both with separate sampling strategies grounded in the survey-design literature.

Survey purpose

Pick one:

Mode Goal Reference
Discovery Find new populations in unsurveyed high-suitability areas Williams et al. 2009
Model validation Test whether the suitability gradient predicts presence/absence Rhoden, Peterman & Taylor 2017

The two modes ask very different questions of the same map, so they sample it differently:

  • Discovery preferentially picks the highest-suitability cells far from any known occurrence — the most informative locations for finding the species where it has not been recorded yet.
  • Model validation stratifies the suitability gradient and samples proportionally within strata — the design needed for an unbiased presence/absence test of the model's calibration.

Priority Sites tab in Discovery mode after extraction

Sampling strategy

A second drop-down picks the within-mode sampling strategy:

Strategy What it does
Top-N (highest first) Take the top-N cells by suitability, subject to spacing constraints
Threshold-stratified Divide cells above the minimum suitability into N quantile bins and sample equally from each
Random above threshold Random draw from cells above the minimum suitability

Top-N is the right choice when you want to maximise hit-rate (the classical Discovery design of Williams et al. 2009). Threshold-stratified is what Rhoden, Peterman & Taylor 2017 recommend for model validation because it gives the test the statistical power to detect a declining presence-rate across the suitability gradient.

Spacing constraints

Two distance fields define the spatial structure of the sampled set:

  • Minimum distance from existing presences — keeps candidates away from known occurrences. Set to the species' detection radius (e.g. 1 km for a calling fairy pitta, 200 m for a sessile slug). This prevents the algorithm from re-sampling territory already covered by earlier surveys.
  • Minimum distance between candidates — keeps the candidate set spatially independent. A typical value is half the minimum distance from existing presences. Whittaker-style spatially balanced sampling, in the sense of Stevens & Olsen 2004, is approximated by setting this value to the median nearest-neighbour distance you want in the final set.

QMaxent enforces both constraints exactly — candidates are dropped, not moved, when a constraint is violated, so the surviving set is always within-spec.

Reverse geocoding

When the Reverse-geocode addresses checkbox is on, QMaxent calls the Nominatim API for each candidate point and adds columns for country, province, city_county, district, and a human-readable display_name. This makes the resulting GeoPackage directly usable for permit applications and field-team coordination — particularly valuable in jurisdictions where survey access requires prior administrative notification.

The geocoder is rate-limited to one request per second to comply with Nominatim's public-server fair-use policy; for large candidate sets (>1,000 points) consider running the extractor in batches or pointing QMaxent at a self-hosted Nominatim instance via the Advanced options.

Priority Sites GeoPackage attribute table with reverse-geocoded addresses

Outputs

After clicking ▶ Extract Priority Sites, two outputs are produced:

  • priority_sites.gpkg — a GeoPackage layer auto-loaded into QGIS and styled with red point symbols.
  • A Priority sites sheet appended to the existing results.xlsx workbook, with the same columns as the GeoPackage attribute table.

Priority Sites tab after extraction with the candidates rendered on the QGIS canvas

The candidates are immediately ready for export to mobile-GIS apps such as QField, Mergin Maps, or Locus Map for offline field use.

Choosing parameter values

Some practical defaults from the literature:

  • Number of candidates: 20–30 per species per season is a typical field-survey budget for a single team (Robinson et al. 2018).
  • Minimum distance from existing presences: the species' typical home-range diameter is a good starting point. Too small and you re-sample known sites; too large and you push candidates into marginal habitat.
  • Minimum suitability: 0.5 for a balanced search; 0.7+ for a focused high-confidence survey; lower (0.2–0.3) for negative controls in a model-validation study.

Worked applications

  • The Bradypus example walks through a Discovery extraction at landscape scale.
  • The Pitta nympha example shows the same workflow at municipality scale, with reverse-geocoded Korean administrative addresses ready for field permits.

Next

Move to Saving and reusing models to learn how to share the trained model with collaborators or re-project it onto a new raster stack later.